翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Coney ・ R v Constanza ・ R v Cook ・ R v Coote ・ R v Coulson, Brooks and others ・ R v Creighton ・ R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd ・ R v Cuerrier ・ R v Cunningham ・ R v Darrach ・ R v Daviault ・ R v Davidson ・ R v Davis ・ R v DB ・ R v Dear ・ R v Department of Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union ・ R v Dersch ・ R v DeSousa ・ R v District Auditor No 3 Audit District of West Yorkshire MCC, ex p West Yorkshire MCC ・ R v Dixon ・ R v Drybones ・ R v Du Plessis ・ R v Duarte ・ R v Dudley and Stephens ・ R v Dyment ・ R v Dytham ・ R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co ・ R v Edwards Books and Art Ltd ・ R v Evans ・ R v Ewanchuk Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Department of Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Department of Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union ''R v Dept of Trade and Industry, ex p Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union'' (2001) (C-173/99 ) is a European labour law and UK labour law case concerning the Working Time Directive, which is relevant for the Working Time Regulations 1998. ==Facts== The original Working Time Regulations 1998 provided for a 13 week qualifying period at work before one could benefit from its protection. This restriction was challenged by the Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematograph and Theatre Union, because there was nothing about it in the Directive. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Department of Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.